Reference › Anti-patterns: combinations that waste effort
Anti-patterns: combinations that waste effort
Anti-patterns: combinations that waste effort
Some action combinations work against each other or produce diminished returns.
| Anti-pattern | Why it’s wrong |
|---|---|
| G-11 before G-1 | Wikipedia work without entity verification produces inconsistencies that editors challenge |
| G-4 before G-3 | Media pitches without substantive content to point to |
| M-3 before M-1 | Hubs addressing the wrong questions |
| G-pillar work while O-pillar is at floor | Generative work invisible because foundations aren’t in place |
| Many parallel actions exceeding capacity | Everything slows down; nothing finishes well |
| Action selection based on stakeholder preference rather than AS finding | Bypasses the diagnostic; produces work that doesn’t address the actual deficit |
| M-1, M-3, G-2 without coordination | Question mapping, hubs, and territories should align; un-coordinated they fragment |
| G-4 and G-9 simultaneously without G-3 substrate | Both need citation-worthy content; without it, both fail |
| Aggressive G-12 correction before G-1 and G-11 establish entity baseline | Corrections without authoritative sources to point to |
| Adding new languages while existing languages aren’t producing measurable progress | Compounds the problem; spreads thin work thinner |